Projected shortfall for the 2004-5 school
year budget from state funding is $625,000. This translates
to salary for 8.5 certified teaching staff. This grant will
allow the district to:
Maintain low student-teacher ratio
Maintain existing electives at the middle school
Retain Literacy Specialists, and
Retain the Math and Science Specialist.
Without this grant, teaching staff would be terminated
and class sizes would increase, the variety of middle school
electives would decrease and we could lose our specialists
in literacy and math & science that district staff depends
upon. Teachers are ranked by order of seniority, specialization
and qualifications. Teachers most vulnerable to layoff are
the recently hired teachers at Fisher.
Metrics for Measurement:
LGUSD Class sizes K-8
Results of Measurement:
Class Size Statistics:
District maintained significantly lower class sizes:
K-3: 20/1
4-8: 25.5
What would class sizes have been without the 8.5 classroom
teachers? (Assuming equal distribution among grade spans)
K-3: 21/1
4-5: 30/1
6-8: 28.8/1
Benefits of
Grant:
This grant has allowed the district to:
maintain lower class sizes
maintain existing electives at Fisher
retain Literacy Specialists
retain the Math and Science Specialist
support differentiating of instruction
Areas for Improvement:
Class sizes in 4 primary classrooms were 21:1 for short
periods of the year. Only one classroom maintained
21:1 through end of P-2 reporting period
Multi-grade classroom was added after school year began
to accommodate new enrollees. Two credentialed
teachers were assigned to that room.
Part I: Strengthen classroom science program; develop assessments
to measure
student learning K-5 - $40,000
Part II: Outfit new Fisher science labs and provide common
training for grade level
teachers to improve quality of Fisher science program - $51,000
Part I: K-5 - $40,000
a. The district will develop student assessments that teachers
can use
to determine which concepts students master and which concepts
need
more attention. Teachers will use the results of the student
assessments to guide their instruction.
b. The district has 60 kits, some of which need to be replaced
and materials updated. Funding will also support content-based,
grade level appropriate books for each kit that would help
students deepen their understanding.
Part II: 6-8 - $51,000
a. Purchase and training in some hands on kits for middle
school
b. Purchase of science equipment to outfit the new science
lab.
c. The grant money for middle school science will pay for
training and
planning time in order to provide a common program for
each grade
level, and for the purchase, training and use of new kits
designed
for middle school science.
d. Purchase science materials such as a Workshop Stand
for each
classroom, drying racks for each classroom, an Air-Powered
Projectile, Newtonian Demonstrator, and a number of other
kits or materials.
Metrics for Measurement:
Assessments completed, equipment purchased for
kits, equipment purchased for Fisher Science lab, test scores
for upper grades (not yet available for assessments)
Results of Measurement:
Part I.
In process: upgrading kits, purchasing/ developing engaging
materials such as a “walk through heart”, upgrading
science kits, purchasing additional science kits so that
grade level teams can teach at the same time, replacing outdated
kits, purchasing leveled reading books tied to the science
standards.
Deepened content knowledge of 4th and 5th grade teachers through
training on the science standards and use of the newly developed
assessments. Assessments for two 4th and two 5th grade units/kits
have been developed and piloted. Additional assessments will
be completed next year and we will have assessment results
to share. Benefits of Grant:
Extremely positive response from 4th and 5th grade trainings
Impact of the new materials and expanded kits will be seen next year Areas for Improvement:
Development of assessments was more challenging than expected and took longer
than planned.
Part II.
Materials were purchased that would support hands on science (e.g. classroom
set of microscopes, equipment to measure speed of falling objects, new projectors
for instruction, models of eye, fault, skeleton, health modules and many smaller,
non-consumable items). Also included about $4,000 for subs, teacher training
and attendance at the NSTA conference. Benefits of Grant:
Teachers are excited with purchases
Many of materials already incorporated
All teachers had input in selection of materials
Materials purchased are non-consumable and will last
All K-5 students; Middle School students in
Choral music and Orchestra, 1675 Students
Grant Description:
This grant has two parts:
Part I - Music Teacher and Collaboration Time for K-5 Staff - $71,500
Part II Additional Support for Music and Movement - $50,000
Part I: Music Teacher and Collaboration Time for K-5 Staff
a. Cost of hiring additional Music teacher.
Part II: Additional Support for Music and Movement
a. At elementary schools, funds would support the purchase
of Orf instruments, Share the Music vocal books for
children, repair of instruments and additional
music stands.
Metrics for Measurement:
Music Teacher hired, Instruments purchased,
Teacher survey for effectiveness of collaboration time, number
of students participating in music
Results of Measurement:
Additional Music Teacher and Program Improvements:
Offered
additional choir class at Fisher
Offered after school chorus
at elementary schools
Provided 5th grade instrumental with
no pullouts
Offered 5th grade choice: instrumental/vocal
6th grade strings meet daily
Distributed monthly newsletters
Developed common curriculum for each grade
Each school site had “Music Open House” performances
for every grade at every K-5 school
Materials and Training
Textbooks
Music stands
Orff instruments and carts to move instruments
and materials from class to class
Koday and Orff methodology—teacher training
Sheet Music for Fisher classes
Carts so teachers can move and manage the orff instruments & other
materials
Collaboration Time: Results
of Teacher Survey
How
do teachers use collaboration
time?
% of
teacher who “regularly” and/or “often” use
collaboration time:
1) Sharing experiences about
new practices 75%
2) Sharing successes 71%
3) Curriculum mapping 68%
4) Setting grade level goals
68%
5) Discussion means of differentiating
68%
6) Planning grade level units
of instruction 59%
This grant has three parts:
I. Artist in the Classroom - $40,000
II. Art Materials for Follow-up Lessons - $10,000
III. Art Docents of Los Gatos - $10,000
Part I: Artist in the Classroom, K-5 (1546 Students)
This year (2003-4) the Artist in the Classroom program
(budget
$20,000) pays a professional artist for two days per
week to work
with teachers and students in the classroom.
This program has a dual purpose: provide art instruction
to children
while also training teachers to develop follow-up lessons
for the
Art Docents (Part III) and Artist in the Classroom.
Part II: Art Materials for Follow-up Lessons, K-5 (1546
Students)
These dollars would be divided among all five schools,
on a per diem
basis. Art materials are expensive and consumable.
State budgets for
art materials have been cut during the past few years.
Part III: Art Docents of Los Gatos, K-6 (1893 Students)
Art Docents provide district wide Art Appreciation
lessons, K-6, to
all students in the district. This grant would be
passed through and
directly awarded ($10,000) to the Art Docents of
Los Gatos, a
non-profit organization that has been providing art
instruction to
LGUSD students for over 30 years.
Metrics for Measurement:
Hiring of Artist, purchasing material, teacher
survey comments, funding to Art Docents
Results of Measurement:
Jack Toolin, as per goal, provided 4-1 hour
visual arts lessons to every K-5 classroom (78, including SDC
classes) and made himself available to teachers after school
and during lunch to consult and coach.
Teacher Survey Comments:
“Jack has modeled (for me and the students) how to really look at something
and plan your representation. Front loading and pre thinking”
“
Visual arts have become more in depth and meaningful. Color schemes, shading
techniques, etc. are terms students use now as a result of Jack’s work
with us.”
“
Watching Jack work with students has made me more aware of the process of drawing,
painting, sculpting. He breaks it down into manageable lessons.”
$10,000
was allocated to each site on a per/student basis. Teachers were able
to purchase quality materials to support the arts program
that they usually can’t
afford, such as water color paper, quality brushes, pastels, drying racks,
brayers and
paints. Allocations to each site were:
Fisher: $3,047
Blossom: $2,469
Van Meter: $1,690
Daves: $2,211
Lexington: $ 582
Monthly instruction for all K-6 classes Art History/Appreciation
and some hands-on workshops.
Areas for Improvement:
Better communication to parents,
like monthly newsletters about curriculum and hands on
instructions the students
are receiving.